Parent Category: 2015 HFE

*By Pasquale Dottorato*

A spiral inductor was analyzed through appropriate Green’s function derived from solution of Maxwell’s equations. The loss mechanism at the substrate was investigated, which included consideration of dissipative coupling, Eddy currents and edge proximity effects. A spiral inductor in 0.35 µm CMOS was simulated, built, and measured. S-parameter, inductance, series resistance and Q-factor were calculated and measured. They were subsequently compared with several models provided in technical literature. Finally, a modified π circuit model was extracted.

** Introduction**

A spiral was built by using one of the metal layers embedded in silicon oxide and placed at some distance from the substrate. When a time varying voltage is applied between ends of the spiral, electrical and magnetic fields are generated. Magnetic Field **b**(t) time variant current flowing along a conductor induces a magnetic field and two effects are produced:

- Self and mutual inductance coupling among the metal tracks of the inductor.
- Eddy currents are induced in the substrate and metal tracks.

The Electric Field, **e**(t), generated as a consequence of the existing voltage difference between the two ends of the spiral, produces ohmic losses in the spiral due to the resistivity of the metal tracks. Furthermore, the electric field passing through the oxide between strips is generated as a result of the existing voltage difference between adjacent strips and the inner connection. It produces the capacitive coupling within the coil. The electric field passing through the oxide and substrate is generated as a result of the existing voltage difference between spiral and substrate. This produces two effects:

- Capacitive coupling between the spiral circuit and substrate;
- Ohmic losses due to displacement currents induced through the capacitive coupling between the spiral and the substrate.

**The Theory**

Maxwell’s equation for curl are [4], [6]:

(1)

with ε, µ complex permittivity electric and magnetic respectively equal:

ε=ε’-jε” and µ=µ’-jµ”

Managing and invoking a Lorentz’s gauge the electromagnetic field is [3], [5], [14]:

(2) (3)

Where

And

**Φ**(**r**,t), **A**(**r**,t), ρ(**r’**) and **J**(**r’**) are defined in [4]; while, G_{E}(**r,r’**) and G_{M}(**r,r’**) are the Green’s function with k run through the conductors which make up device; V’ is the volume of all conductors.

From (1), (2) and (3) we obtain for *i-th* segment:

(4)

In general, the current density is non-uniform across the cross-section of each segment. The non- uniformity is due to current constriction and proximity effect. If, however, we discretize [13], [14] and [28] the cross-section into k sections of constant current density, then (4) will take another form:

(5)

where I_{im}, is current inside the sub-segment m of segment i,**l _{m}** is vector in the direction of the segment, and w

_{i,m}is a function that has a volume of 1/a

_{i,m}inside the cross-sectional area of sub segment m of segment i. Therefore:

With

(6)

and S_{k} is kept the volume V_{k}.

The equation (6) can be simplified [10], [20] if we make the assumption that the potential drops across parallel sub-segments are equals. We will simplify the above equation to:

(7)

Or in matrix notation:

(8)

The matrix [M] has has diagonal entries representing the internal impedance of each segment and the off-diagonal terms represent the external magnetic coupling from segment to segment. The Green’s function is [2], [3], [5]:

(9)

Where r, r’ identifies the position; therefore the equation (5), (6) and (7) leads to the following definition for M_{ik} about magnetic coupling [6]:

(10)

V_{i} and V_{j} denotes the conductive region (segments), while I_{i}, I_{j} are the total currents through their segments. The (10) is handled differently depending whether self-inductances (i=j) a mutual inductances (i≠j) are calculated. This relates the inductances only geometry; however, this result in closed form expression for elementary shapes of geometries. The vector dot product quantifies into the well-known observation that the mutual inductance between two elements is a maximum when the current flow is in the same direction. When the current flow is in opposite direction, the mutual inductance is a minimum and negative; while, if the current elements are in orthogonal directions, then, the mutual inductance is zero. Likewise for electric field we obtain [11]:

(11)

Therefore:

(12)

[C] is the capacitance matrix, it’s obtained from inverse potential matrix [*P*] [20] that define as:

(13)

In (13) we can identify the real part as due to the finite conductivity of the substrate, in fact apply the charge conservation equation at each segment we obtain:

(14) (15)

The inversion of the matrix [P] is neither simple nor quickly solved; however, the use of techniques such as Cholesky decomposition or DCT (Discrete Cosine Transform) methods help the development of efficient algorithms making calculations [14].

**Spiral Inductor**

For evaluation (8) and (12) we introduce the GMD AMD and AMSD concept, yielding the following general approximate expression [4] for two parallel conductor (i and j) straight with rectangular cross-section :

(16)

Equations (16) are expressed in nH. There are four cases possible for calculating the mutual inductance;

Figure 1 • Example of calculation of M for two planar conductors.

(16.1)

These equations apply from (a) to (c) case. The index i and j are conductors; p and q are the index of the length for the difference in the length of two conductors and its angle tilt. A matrix representation allows one to visualize the terms better. Since reciprocity holds (M_{ij}=M_{ji}), we obtain a symmetric matrix implying that we only need to compute half of (n^{2}-n) mutual inductance terms:

(17)

Where M_{ij} elements of the matrix is the mutual inductance between I and j conductor if i ≠ j, while L_{ij}, is self-inductance of the i^{th} conductor if i = j. In order, the rectangular coil of n turn has N=4n segments, 2[n] of which are orthogonal to the other 2[n] segment of the 2[n] parallel segment, n have current flow in the opposite direction to the other n. Using symmetry we can write the total inductance as

(18)

Where M^{+}_{ij} denotes the positive mutual inductance terms and M^{-}_{ij} denotes the negative mutual inductance terms. As well from trace of matrix (17) the coefficient of self-induction of the coil.

**Loss Mechanism**

All integrated passive devices suffer from substrate effects, in fact the spiral inductor fabricated on substrate experienced significant losses due to the magnetically and electrically induced Eddy current [1], [9], [20] and [22]. The objective of the parasitic extraction is to compute the capacitance matrix C for a multi conductor geometry [11]. Eddy current densities are higher at the edges of the conductor body where they are developed and the skin effect is formed. Analysis shows that the magnetic field and thus inductance of one conducting loop is dramatically affected by eddy currents distributed within a nearby conducting ground plane.

Figure 2 • Loss mechanism for on-chip spiral inductor.

The use of the Green’s function greatly simplifies the problem by implicitly taking into account the boundary conditions, making it unnecessary to discretize the boundaries. The Green function has been previously computed in analytical form from [20]. Replacing this in (6), (11) and solving for the source leads to the finding in [14]. Follow immediately from here:

(19)

The capacitance connected between contact-i and contact-j is then given by:

(20)

where φ_{m}^{i} is the potential on the m-th subdivision of contact-I; while the conductance between contact-i and contact-j is given by:

(21)

Let contact-i have N subdivisions, and contact-j have M_{h} subdivisions, furthermore the element of [C] representing interaction between the m-th division of ‘i’ and the n-th division of ‘j’ be given by .

With equation (19), (20) and (21) we account for all loss mechanisms. From this we can extract an π circuit model as shown in figure 2. Here ohmic loss is a factor limiting the inductor performance. For spiral inductors operating at high frequencies, the series resistance is frequency dependent; substrate parasitics result from the electrical coupling between the metal track and substrate, as the metal track of a spiral inductor can be considered as a microstrip on substrate with waves passing through it. Three elements, C_{OX}, G_{SUB}, and C_{SUB}, are used to model the substrate. The frequency-dependent permittivity ε_{eff} (f) is needed to model the frequency-dependent capacitance.

Figure 3 • Improved inductor model with horizontally coupled Resistance and Capacitance R_{SUB} and C_{SUB}.

**Modified π Circuit Model**

Some studies have been conducted to improve the accuracy of the simple lumped models. Though Cao et al. [28] proposed a double π model to account for the frequency-dependant resistance and inductance, here, we refer to Gil and Shin [31] modified the simple π model by adding the horizontally coupled substrate resistor and capacitor. The equivalent circuit and results of Q factor are given in Figure 3 and Figure 7.

Figure 4 • (a) Topology (b) cross section of the on-chip square shaped inductor.

**Model Verification and Result**

A symmetrical spiral inductor fabricated with the 0.35*µm* CMOS technology was first simulated with Sonnet simulator [33] and measured to verify the model developed. The inductor was built on a 9.59*µm* oxide and 500*µm* silicon substrate. The inductor has 6 turns with metal width of 15*μm*, metal thickness of 2*μm*, and metal line spacing of 8*μm*. Two-port parameters were measured, and the inductance, resistance and quality factor of the inductor were extracted. In addition to the present model, two existing inductor models Yue and Wong [28], Mohan et al. [32] intended for the asymmetrical inductors were considered. The topology of the inductors and its layers are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 5 • Comparisons of the present model, existing models, and measurements of (a) Quality Factor (b) Inductance and (c) Series Resistance for built symmetrical inductor.

The inductors were measured using an Agilent network analyzer and properly de-embedded (see Figure 8). We carry out the simulated and measured data from Figure 5 to Figure 7 and in Table 1.

Figure 6 • Comparisons of the present model, existing models, and measurements of (a) Magnitude and (b) Phase of S_{21 }for built symmetrical inductor.

The present model demonstrates a better accuracy over the existing models for a wide range of operating frequencies. Thus, our results suggested that it is erroneous and impractical to use the inductor model developed intended for asymmetrical inductors for predicting the characteristics of symmetrical inductors.

Figure 7 • Q Factors Measured and Simulated with and without R_{SUB} and C_{SUB}.

Figure 8 • Block Diagram of the VNA De-embedding DUT from Fixture Setup Measurement.

Table 1 • Extraction Modified π Circuit Model.

**Conclusion**

A numerical compact and accurate model for spiral inductors has been developed through the Green’s function. The Sonnet 2,5D EM simulator tool was used to numerical model. Unlike the existing inductor models which were developed intended only for asymmetrical inductors, the present model is shown capable of predicting accurately both the symmetrical and asymmetrical inductors. The concept of the effective line width was introduced to account for the effect of non-uniform current distribution in the metal lines, and overlap parasitics and geometry factors have also been included. Comparisons among the present model, existing models, and measured data were presented to illustrate the usefulness of this work.

**About the Author:**

Dr. Dottorato was born in November 23, 1969. He is a Sr. RF & Microwave Designer Consultant and member of IEEE. He received the “Laurea” degree in electrical engineering “cum laude” and Ph.D. degree from University of Naples. After an interesting experience at IRECE and electronics and telecommunication department at University “Federico II” of Naples, he worked in the design of microwave equipment for Oerlikon Contraves, an electronics defense company in Rome. Since 2005 he has been working in the R&D department of an electronics company in Bologna. Interests include numerical modelling of inverse and scattering electromagnetic problems, the design of microwave devices with operating frequencies up to 110 GHz such as: antennas, conformal antennas for EW applications, LNAs, HPA pHmet and GaN technology processes, MMIC/RFIC in CMOS GaAs and InP technology processes.

**References**

[1] J. A. Tegopoulos and E. E. Kriezis, *Eddy Currents in Linear Conducting Media.* Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1985.

[2] Chen-to Tai, *Dyadic Green Functions in Electromagnetic Theory,* Scranton, In text Educational Publishers, 1971.

[3] J. D. Stratton, *Electromagnetics Theory.* New York: McGraw-Hill, 1941.

[4] F. W. Grove, *Inductance Calculations.* New York: Van Nostrand, 1946.

[5] D. M. Pozar, *Microwave Engineering,* 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1998.

[6] R. Gharapurey & R. G. Meyer, “Modeling and analysis of substrate coupling in integrated circuits”, *IEEE Journal Solid State Circuit, *Vol 31, N. 3, pp 344-353 Mar 1996.

[7] H. Yaneri @ al., “Analytical modeling the substrate effect in symmetric coupled interconnects of hig speed VLSI circuit”, *Revista de Fisica Applicada e Instumentaçao, *Vol. 17 N. 1, Março 2003

[8] H. Ymeri, B. Nauwelaers, K. Maex, @ al. “Frequency – dependent internal inductance associated with silicon subsrate of on chip”, *International Scientific conference radioelektronika 2002, *Bratislava, Slovak rep. 14-16 May.

[9] J. A. Ferreira, “Improved analytical modelling of conductive losses in magnetic components”, *IEEE Trans. Power Electron, *Vol. 9 N. 1, pp 127-131, Jan 1994

[10] C. Wei, R. F. Harrington, J. R. Mautz and T. K. Sarkar, “Multiconductor Transmission Lines in Multilayered Dielectric Media”, *IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques,* Vol.32, No.4, pp. 439-449, April 1984.

[11] W. T. Weeks, “Calculation of Coefficients of Capacitance of Multiconductor Transmission Lines in the presence of a Dielectric Interface”, *IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, *Vol.18, No.1, pp. 35-43, January 1970.

[12] R. Gharpurey and R. G. Meyer, “Analysis and Simulation of Substrate Coupling in Integrated Circuits”, to be published in *The International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications.*

[13] J. N. Burghartz, “On the design of RF spiral inductors on silicon,” *IEEE Trans. Electron Devices,* vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 718–729, Mar. 2003.

[14] A. Niknejad and R. Meyer, “Analysis, design, and optimization of spiral inductors and transformers for Si RF ICs,” *IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits,* vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1470–1481, Oct. 1998.

[15] Y. Cao, R. A. Groves, X. Huang, N. D. Zamdmer, J.-O. Plouchart, R. A. Wachnik, T.-J. King, and C. Hu, “Frequency-independent equivalent circuit model for on-chip inductors,” *IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits,* vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 419–426, Mar. 2003.

[16] W. Gao and Z. P. Yu, “Scalable compact circuit model and synthesis for RF CMOS spiral inductors,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1055–1064, Mar. 2006.

[17] K. Y. Lee, S. Mohammadi, P. K. Bhattacharya, and L. P. B. Katehi, “A wideband compact model for integrated inductors,” *IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett.,* vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 490–492, Sep. 2006.

[18] N. A. Talwalkar, C. P. Yue, and S. S.Wong, “Analysis and synthesis of on-chip spiral inductors,”* IEEE Trans. Electron Devices,* vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 176–182, Feb. 2005.

[19] X. Huo, P. C. H. Chan, K. J. Chen, and H. C. Luong, “A physical model for on-chip spiral inductors with accurate substrate modeling,” *IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, *vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 2942–2949, Dec. 2006.

[20] A. M. Niknejad and R. G. Meyer, “Analysis of eddy-current losses over conductive substrates with applications to monolithic inductors and transformers,” *IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech.,* vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 166–176, Jan. 2001.

[21] D. Melendy and A.Weisshaar, “A new scalable model for spiral inductors on lossy silicon substrate,” in *IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig.*, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 1007–1010.

[21] W. Roshen, “Effect of finite thickness of magnetic substrate on planar inductors,” *IEEE Trans. Magn.,* vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 270–275, Jan. 1990

[22] H. M. Greenhouse, “Design of planar rectangular microelectronic inductors,” *IEEE Trans. Parts, Hybrids Packag.,* vol. PHP-10, no. 2, pp. 101–109, Jun. 1974.

[24] E. B. Rosa and F. W. Grover. “Formulas and tables for the calculation of mutual and self-inductance”. Government Printing OÆce, 1916.

[25] Seung-Min Oh, Chang-Wan Kim, and Sang-Gug Lee, *A 74%, 1.56 ~2.71 GHz, wide-tunable LC-tuned VCO in 0.35 µm CMOS technology, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, *Vol. 37, pp. 98-100, April 2003.

[26] C. Patrick Yue and S. Simon Wong, *Physical modeling of spiral inductors on silicon, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices,* Vol. 47, March 2000.

[27] J. Crols, P. Kinget, J. Craninckx, and M. Steyeart, *An analytical model of planar inductors on lowly doped silicon substrates for analog design up to 3GHz, Digest of VLSI Circuits, *pp. 28-29, 1996.

[28] Yu Cao, R. A. Groves, N. D. Zamdmer, J. O. Plouchart, R. A. Wachnik, Xuejue Huang, T. J. King, and Chenming Hu, *Frequency-independent equivalent circuit model for on-chip spiral inductors,* Proc. IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 217–220, 2002.

[29] Ban-Leong Ooi, Dao-Xian Xu, Pang-Shyan Kooi, and Fu-Jiang Lin, *An improved prediction of series resistance in spiral inductor modeling with eddy-current effect,* IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 50, Pages 2202-2206, Sept. 2002.

[30] W. B. Kuhn and N. M. Ibrahim, *Approximate analytical modeling of current crowding effects in multi-turn spiral inductors, *Digest of Microwave Symposium, Pages 405-408, June 2002.

[31] Joonho Gil and Hyungcheol Shin, *Simple wide-band on-chip inductor model for silicon-based RF ICs,* International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices, Pages 35–38, Sept. 2003.

[32] Sunderarajan S. Mohan, Mari del Mar Hershenson, Stephen P. Boyd, and Thomas H. Lee, *Simple Accurate Expressions for Planar Spiral Inductances, *IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, Oct. 1999.

[33] Sonnet Software web site www.sonnetsoftware.com.

### March 2020

### Search

### Contact Us

Advertising Sales - Mid Atlantic

848-757-2930

Fax: 631-667-2871

Scott Spencer

Publisher

603-759-1840

Tim Burkhard

Associate Publisher/Managing Editor

707-696-2162

Fax: 707-544-9375

Stuart Dale

Advertising Sales – New England

508-740-6128

Jeff Victor

Advertising Sales - Western U.S. - New Accounts

847-721-2730

Fax: 509-472-1888

Sam Baird

Advertising Sales - UK and Europe

+44 1883 715 697

Fax: +44 1883 715 697

Joanne Frangides

Advertising Sales - New Accounts & Product Showcase

201-666-6698

Fax: 201-666-6698